<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rights and Royalties News &#187; BRR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rightsandroyalties.com/tag/brr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rightsandroyalties.com</link>
	<description>Your Source for News Affecting Rights, Royalties and the Future of Publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 21:41:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Watch Article:  Should Google Be Allowed to Monopolize &#8220;Orphan&#8221; Books?</title>
		<link>http://www.rightsandroyalties.com/2009/07/tech-watch-article-should-google-be-allowed-to-monopolize-orphan-books/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rightsandroyalties.com/2009/07/tech-watch-article-should-google-be-allowed-to-monopolize-orphan-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Rights Registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Book Settlement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rightsandroyalties.com/2009/07/09/tech-watch-article-should-google-be-allowed-to-monopolize-orphan-books/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;One possible outcome: Google may be asked to pay $125 million towards the establishment of a Book Rights Registry that would store and register the names and locations of book copyright owners. For that public service, they&#8217;d be allowed &#8230;&#8221; http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/chris-dannen/techwatch/should-google-be-allowed-monopolize-orphan-books Royalty Software Royalty Payments Royalty Accounting]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;One possible outcome: Google may be asked to pay $125 million towards the establishment of a Book Rights Registry that would store and register the names and locations of book copyright owners. For that public service, they&#8217;d be allowed &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/chris-dannen/techwatch/should-google-be-allowed-monopolize-orphan-books">http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/chris-dannen/techwatch/should-google-be-allowed-monopolize-orphan-books</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.metacomet.com/royalty-software.htm">Royalty Software</a><br />
<a href="http://www.metacomet.com/">Royalty Payments</a><br />
<a href="http://www.metacomet.com/Royalty-Software/about-royalty-tracker.htm">Royalty Accounting</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rightsandroyalties.com/2009/07/tech-watch-article-should-google-be-allowed-to-monopolize-orphan-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

